A
Federal high court sitting in Lagos south west Nigeria today adjourned
till 4th of December, 2018 for the hearing of preliminary objection
filed by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and other pending
applications in the suit filed by MTN Nigeria communications Limited
against the Central bank of Nigeria CBN fine of $8,134,312,397.63 .
Joined as co-defendant is the Attorney General of the Federation AGF
When the case was mentioned Chief Wole Olanipekun SAN leading four
other Senior Advocates of Nigeria and 15 other lawyers informed the
court that CBN has filed defence and counter claim to the suit filed by
MTN and his client had also filed response to the said defence and
counter claim.
However the counsel representing the CBN Mr Seyi Sowemimo SAN,
leading Mr Demola Akinrele SAN and nine other lawyers told the court
that the CBN has filed preliminary objection in addition to the already
filed statement of defence and counter claim, though the Attorney
General of Federation has not filed any defence, the presiding Judge,
Justice Saliu Saidu also observed that there is no proof of service
before the court to show that the AGF has filed any response, though
there is proof of services of other process filed by other parties.
Thereafter, by the agreement of the the counsels of the two parties, Justice Saidu adjourned for hearing.
In a statement of claim jointly filed before the court by Chief
Wole Olanipekun and four other Senior Advocates of Nigeria,MTN states
that between 2001and 2006 its shareholders invested the total sum of
$402,590,261.03 into it to meet the various obligations ,including
statutory payments to the government of Nigeria which was confirmed by
the CBN.
The investment were issued by authorized dealers who are Standard
Chartered bank, Diamond bank and Citibank,the CCI were converted into
equity and preferential shares, as the article of the association allows
it to alter its share capital.
However by a letter signed by the Governor of Central bank CBN
communicated a decision to MTN through the Managing Director of Stanbic
Chartered bank limited whereby it decided amongst others, against the
plaintiff, that “the action of your company and the banks represent a
flagrant violation of the extant laws and regulation of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria on foreign exchange matters.
The sum of $8,134,312,397.63 illegally repatriated by MTN on the
basis of illegally issued of Certificate of Capital importation CCIs
should be refunded to the covers of the central bank of Nigeria with
immediate effect “
MTN posits that the CBN lacks power to make a finding of illegality
and it also has no power to penalise the plaintiff on its illegality in
the sum of $8,134,312,397.63 or in any sum whatsoever.
Consequently the plaintiff claims against the defendants thus :A
declaration that the CBN lacks the power to determine the civil
obligations or penal liabilities of the plaintiff.
A declaration that the plaintiff is not liable to pay the sum of
$8,134,312,397.63 demanded as penalty from it by the defendants vide his
letter of 3rd September,2018.
An Order of injunction restraining the defendants ,their agents
whatsoever acting on their authority from giving effect to the
decisions,demands and directive contained in the letters of August
28,2018 and September,2018 issued by the CBN.
However in a statement of defence and counter claim filed before
the court by the CBN counsel, Mr Seyi Sowemimo,the Apex bank averred
that MTN Nigeria communication limited deliberately withheld information
on What proportion of the sum of $402,590,261,03 was imported into the
Federal Republic of Nigeria as Shareholders loan and was equity.
In the course of its supervision of the foreign exchange market, an
issue of foreign exchange with irregular CERTIFICATE OF CAPITAL
IMPORTATION (CCI) arose in respect of certain foreign exchange
transactions carried out by Standard Chartered bank Limited,Stanbic
IBTC bank limited,Citi bank Nigeria limited and Diamond bank Plc
collectively referred to as “the banks”
CBN carried out a special investigation of the said transactions and
it came to light that the banks had at the material time between 2007
and 2015 issued irregular CCI to remit foreign exchange amounting to$8
134,312,397.63 on behalf of MTN Communications Limited and for the
benefit of its shareholders.
CBN met the banks and MTN’s representatives on 25th May,2018 on the
issue and they each made copious representation to CBN. Upon
consideration of all the relevant issues including MTN and the banks’
representations CBN demanded immediate refund of the foreign currenci es
repatriated to its account.
Standard Chartered bank limited, one of the banks involved in the
irregular transactions admitted in writing that it repatriated foreign
exchange for MTN without obtaining a final approval from CBN, it further
stated that its action was unintentional omission which is regretted,
and the MTN conceded this in its statement of claim. CBN intended to
rely on the Standard Chartered bank limited letter at the trial of this
suit.
CBN averred further that contrary to the statement of claim of MTN, it
was condition precedent to obtain the CBN’s final approval before
foreign exchange currency can be repatriated in the circumstances and
MTN and the banks are aware of this condition.
CBN contended that MTN would not make a similar claim of right as is
being made in this suit in United States Of America, in the United
kingdom, the Republic of South Africa or other countries of the world.
MTN did not comply with the conditions attached to the CBN approval
in principle,as MTN refused to provide an undertaking that no remittance
for both interest and principal would be made on loan to its
shareholders from the date of the loan to the date of its conversion
into preference shares. CBN averred that the names of the banks were cleverly omitted by MTN from this suit.
The CBN did not deny that the plaintiff has a right to alter its
share capital structure, but such alteration has a corresponding effect
of CCI from shareholders loan to equity, its approval became
necessary.
The action of the banks and the circumstances of MTN leads to the
inference that the foreign investment transaction may have been
premeditated and contrive as a scam to make maximise profits, defraud
the Federal Republic of Nigeria and to enjoy unlimited foreign exchange
laws and regulation.
Contrary to the averments of the plaintiff, CBN averred that it is
empowered by statute to summarily exercise certain disciplinary powers
on the dealers and the participants of the foreign exchange for its
Naira equivalent the foreign currencies irregularly repatriated through
the banks by the MTN. Most importantly, and contrary to the averments of the plaintiffs,
the $8,134,312,394.63 improperly repatriated by the plaintiff and the
banks were purchased from the foreign reserve of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria maintained by the CBN for the welfare and benefit of all
Nigerians.
CBN avers further that the amount improperly purchased signifies a
large fraction of the current total reserves of the CBN which stood at
$45,000,000,000.as at 20th September, 2018.
The CBN maintains that MTN is not entitled to the award of any
reliefs against it and shall prove at the trial that the plaintiff’s
claims against it are frivolous, baseless, unmeritorious ,and a tactic
to frustrate the enforcement of the directive of the CBN.
Consequently, the defendants counter claim in the sum of
$8,134,312,397.63 and the sum of N400million as the solicitors fees and
litigation cost. Interest on same at the rate of 15% per annum from 28th
August, 2018 till judgement and thereafter, at the rate of10% till
final liquidation.